4.5 Article

Methylprednisolone and interleukin-10 reduce gray matter damage in the contused Fischer rat thoracic spinal cord but do not improve functional outcome

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 653-666

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/089771502753754118

Keywords

cytokine; glucocorticosteroid; inflammation; methylprednisolone sodium succinate; secondary tissue loss; spinal cord injury

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [P01NS38665] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of two antiinflammatory and neuroprotective agents, methylprednisolone (MP) and interleukin-10 (IL-10), singly and in combination on tissue damage, axonal preservation and functional recovery were studied in the contused adult Fischer rat thoracic spinal cord 12 weeks after injury. NIP (30 mg/kg at 5 min, and 2 and 4 h after injury) was administered intravenously and IL-10 (15 or 30 mug/kg at 30 min after injury), intraperitoneally. MP, IL-10, or the combination significantly reduced the volume of damaged tissue (including cavities) compared to control animals. The loss of spinal tissue (cavities) was reduced after treatment with MP alone or combined with IL-10, but not with IL-10 alone. The reduction in tissue damage was confined to spinal gray matter; at the level of the lesion epicenter, the thickness of the lateral white matter columns was similar in all groups. Retrograde tracing using fast blue revealed that the number of spared propriospinal and supraspinal projections was similar in all groups at 12 weeks after the contusion. The open-field BBB-test showed no significant difference in hindlimb locomotion between groups. Our results demonstrate that all tested antfinflammatory treatments significantly increase the volume of spared spinal gray matter 3 months after a moderate contusion of the Fischer rat thoracic spinal cord, but none of the treatments improved axonal preservation or functional recovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available