4.4 Article

Regional estimates of radiated seismic energy

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 92, Issue 4, Pages 1241-1255

Publisher

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0120000932

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We revise the spectral technique for estimating radiated energy from recordings of large earthquakes at regional distances (Delta < 200 km) by correcting for geometric spreading and for site amplification as explicit functions of frequency. We analyze 65 recordings of the 1999 Hector Mine earthquake as functions of frequency, distance, and azimuth. For r > 27.5 km from the source, we model the geometrical spreading of the regional wavefield as r(-gamma) where gamma = 0.5 for f less than or equal to 0.2 Hz and gamma = 0.7 for f greater than or equal to 0.25 Hz. We fit the spectral falloff with distance using a frequency-dependent attenuation Q = 400(f/1.5)(0.6), where Q = 400 for f less than or equal to 1.5 Hz. There is little directivity apparent in the corrected velocity spectra: the velocity spectra observed to the northwest along strike are amplified by a factor of 2.5 from 0.3 to 1.0 Hz and those to the southeast are amplified by a factor of 1.6 from 0.3 to 0.7 Hz. We group the stations in NEHRP site classes, using average I-D velocity structures to estimate site amplification as a function of frequency and assuming 0.40 less than or equal to kappa less than or equal to 0.55 see for the near-surface attenuation. We increase the amplification of the soft-soil sites from 0.1 to 1.0 Hz by a factor that reaches 1.7 at 0.3 Hz because they are more strongly amplified than the NEHRP-D velocity structure predicts. We combine the 65 single-station estimates of radiated energy using an equal-azimuth weighting scheme that compensates for station distribution and incorporates the observed directivity, yielding a regional estimate of E-s = 3.4 +/- 0.7 X 10(22) dyne cm. This regional estimate of radiated energy corresponds closely to the teleseismic estimate of E-s = 3.2 X 10(22) dyne cm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available