4.5 Article

Respiration-induced B0 fluctuations and their spatial distribution in the human brain at 7 tesla

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 888-895

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10145

Keywords

physiological artifacts; respiration artifacts; echoplanar imaging; B-0 fluctuation; off-resonance

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR08079] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01MH55346] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In functional magnetic resonance imaging (WRI), it is known that physiological influences such as cardiac pulsation, respiration, and brain motion can induce fluctuations in signal intensity and phase. Some of the mechanisms potentially involved in those phenomena are expected to be amplified at higher magnetic fields. This study addresses the issue of Bo fluctuations induced by susceptibility changes during respiration attributed to movements of chest and diaphragm, and variations in the oxygen concentration. It is demonstrated that respiration-induced resonance offsets (RIROs) are significant at 7T. Data were acquired with an RF pulse (no gradients), multislice echoplanar imaging (EPI), and dynamic 3D fast low-angle shot (3D-FLASH) imaging. Three main observations summarize the experimental findings. First, in FIDs measured after a single RIF pulse, a RIRO with a large amplitude was consistently detected, although the average amplitude varied between subjects from 1.45 Hz to 4 Hz. Second, in transverse EPI images obtained in the occipital lobe, the RIRO amplitude showed a monotonic Increase along the z axis toward the lungs. Third, a more detailed spatial analysis with 3D-FLASH phase maps revealed that a previously published analytical model can accurately describe the spatial distribution of RIRO. Consequential apparent motions in the EPI series, as well as the implications of slice orientation for correction strategies are discussed. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available