4.7 Article

Particle number size distributions in a street canyon and their transformation into the urban-air background: measurements and a simple model study

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 36, Issue 13, Pages 2215-2223

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00174-7

Keywords

traffic emissions; number size distribution; air pollution study; urban atmosphere

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Car traffic is one of the main anthropogenic aerosol sources in modern cities. The characterization of these emissions is important for describing the quality of urban air. Measurements in a street canyon in a German urban area were made. Maximum number concentrations occurred during morning hours from Monday to Friday when the traffic density is highest. The maximum of the number size distribution measured during rush hour near a busy city street was at a particle diameter of 15 nm. This differs significantly from size distributions directly measured in vehicle exhaust (vehicles placed on chassis dynamometers used for vehicle emissions certification), typically about 50 nm. The size distributions measured in the urban area depended on the distance to the nearest road. With increasing distance, the maximum of the size distribution increased, and the total number concentration decreased. This seems to be a result of particle growth due to processes such as coagulation and condensation, and dilution with the surrounding air. To clarify the transformation of the particle number size distributions measured in a street canyon into the urban-air background, a sectional aerosol model was used to calculate the evolution of the number size distribution, and included the effect of condensation, coagulation, dilution, and continuous entrainment of freshly emitted particles yielding good agreement with measurements. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available