4.7 Article

Difference in δ15N signatures between nodulated roots and shoots of soybean is indicative of the contribution of symbiotic N2 fixation to plant N

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 53, Issue 371, Pages 1109-1118

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jexbot/53.371.1109

Keywords

glycine max; mineral nitrogen uptake; delta N-15; nitrogen fixation; soybean

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Symbiotic N-2 fixation has a variable effect on the N-15 abundance of different parts of legumes. Increases in fixation result in N-15 enrichment of nodules, while decreases, in combination with an increased uptake of mineral N, result in N-15 depletion of the root system. The difference between soybean shoot and below-ground delta(15)N (Deltadelta(15)N = delta(15)N(shoot)-delta(15)N(belowground)) was assessed in hydroponic culture over a range of rates of supply of mineral N. The fractional contribution of N-2 fixation to N uptake (%Ndfa) was determined using the natural abundance (NA) technique with ryegrass as a reference plant. Deltadelta(15)N and %Ndfa were highly correlated, and the relationship was tested using the same soybean cultivar grown in pots in N-rich soil. Estimates of %Ndfa derived from the NA method and from the Deltadelta(15)N approach yielded near-identical values. A literature survey showed similar relationships between %Ndfa and Deltadelta(15)N with different growth stages of soybeans grown under glasshouse and field conditions, different cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) cultivars in the field, and tagasaste (Chamaecytisus proliferus) in hydroponic culture. Possible confounding and species-specific (either plant or Rhizobium spp.) influences are discussed. The difference in delta(15)N signatures between nodulated roots and shoots is confirmed as a robust means of quantifying %Ndfa: it is independent of reference plants and offers the possibility of estimating %Ndfa in soils where the isotope composition of mineral N closely matches that of atmospheric N-2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available