4.3 Article

Correlations among predawn leaf, midday leaf, and midday stem water potential and their correlations with other measures of soil and plant water status in Vitis vinifera

Journal

Publisher

AMER SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.21273/JASHS.127.3.448

Keywords

grapevines; photosynthesis; stomatal conductance; plant water status

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study was conducted to compare three measurements of determining water status of grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) in the field. Predawn leaf water potential (Psi(PD)), midday leaf water potential (Psi(PD)), and midday stem water potential (Psi(stem)) were measured on 'Chardonnay' and 'Cabernet Sauvignon' grapevines grown in Napa Valley, California late in the 1999 growing season. Both cultivars had been irrigated weekly at various fractions (0, 0.5, and 1.0 for 'Chardonnay' and 0, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.5 for 'Cabernet') of estimated vineyard evapotranspiration (ETc) from approximately anthesis up to the dates of measurements. Predawn water potential measurements were taken beginning at 0330 HR and completed before sunrise. Midday Psi(i) and Psi(stem) measurements were taken only between 1230 and 1330 HR. In addition, net CO2 assimilation rates (A) and stomatal conductance to water vapor (g(s)) were also measured at midday. Soil water content (SWC) was measured in the 'Chardonnay' vineyard using a neutron probe. Values obtained for Psi(PD), Psi(1), and Psi(stem) in this study ranged from about -0.05 to -0.8, -0.7 to -1.8, and -0.5 to -1.6 MPa, respectively. All three measurements of vine water status were highly correlated with one another. Linear regression analysis of Psi(1) and Psi(stem) versus Psi(PD) resulted in r(2) values of 0.88 and 0.85, respectively. A similar analysis of Psi(1) as a function of Psi(stem) resulted in an r(2) of 0.92. In the 'Chardonnay' vineyard, all three methods of estimating vine water status were significantly (P < 0.01) correlated with SWC and applied amounts of water. Lastly, Psi(PD), Psi(1), and Psi(stem) were all linearly correlated with measurements of A and g(s) at midday. Under the conditions of this study, Psi(PD), Psi(1), and Psi(stem) represent equally viable methods of assessing the water status of these grapevines. They were all correlated similarly with the amount of water in the soil profile and leaf gas exchange as well as with one another.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available