4.7 Article

Minimalism approach for determination of Cu, Fe and Zn in serum by simultaneous electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 458, Issue 2, Pages 321-329

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(02)00057-0

Keywords

simultaneous determination; electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry; minimalism; serum; copper; iron; zinc

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Copper, iron and zinc were determined in serum by simultaneous atomic absorption spectrometry (SIMAAS). The minimalism approach was adopted throughout this analytical method, to reduce time, costs, sample, reagent, energy requirements, and residue production. Samples were 80-fold diluted with 0.01% (w/v) Triton X-100 + 1% (v/v) HNO3 directly in the autosampler cups. Three strategies were implemented to match the final diluted analyte concentrations with the SEMAAS linear concentration ranges: a reduced 5 mul aliquot of analytical reference or diluted sample solution was introduced into the preheated graphite tube at 100degreesC; a super-estimated pyrolysis temperature was chosen for selective zinc volatilization; and a mini argon flow of 50 ml min(-1) was used during the atomization step. The pyrolysis and atomization temperatures for the simultaneous heating program were 700 and 2300degreesC, respectively. The characteristic masses for copper (26 pg), iron (16 pg), and zinc (2.7 pg) were estimated from the analytical graphs. The detection limits (n = 20, 3sigma) were 4.0, 2.2, and 0.4 mug l(-1) for copper, iron and zinc, respectively. The reliability of the entire procedure was checked with the analysis of Seronorm(TM) trace elements in serum (Sero AS). Serum samples of five volunteers were analyzed and the recovery tests for additions of 2.0, 2.0 and 1.0 mg l(-1) were 100 +/- 4, 99 +/- 6, and 95 +/- 5% for copper, iron and zinc, respectively. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available