4.6 Article

Direct evidence for nitric oxide production by a nitric-oxide synthase-like protein from Bacillus subtilis

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 277, Issue 18, Pages 16167-16171

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M201136200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA53914] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitric-oxide synthases (NOSs) are widely distributed among prokaryotes and eukaryotes and have diverse functions in physiology. Recent genome sequencing revealed NOS-like protein in bacteria, but whether these proteins generate nitric oxide is unknown. We therefore cloned, expressed, and purified a NOS-like protein from Bacillus subtilis (bsNOS) and characterized its catalytic parameters in both multiple and single turnover reactions. bsNOS was dimeric, bound L-Arg and 6R-tetrahydrobiopterin with similar affinity as mammalian NOS, and generated nitrite from L-Arg when incubated with NADPH and a mammalian NOS reductase domain. Stopped-flow analysis showed that ferrous bsNOS reacted with O-2 to form a transient heme Fe(II)O-2 Species in the presence of either Arg or the reaction intermediate N-hydroxy-L-arginine. In the latter case, disappearance of the Fe(II)O-2 species was kinetically and quantitatively coupled to formation of a transient heme Fe(III)NO product, which then dissociated to form ferric bsNOS. This behavior mirrors mammalian NOS enzymes and unambiguously shows that bsNOS can generate NO. NO formation required a bound tetrahydropteridine, and the kinetic effects of this cofactor were consistent with it donating an electron to the Fe(II)O-2 intermediate during the reaction. Dissociation of the heme Fe(III)NO product was much slower in bsNOS than in mammalian NOS. This constrains allowable rates of ferric heme reduction by a protein redox partner and underscores the utility of using a tetrahydropteridine electron donor in bsNOS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available