4.7 Article

Hydrogen peroxide in natural cloud water: Sources and photoreactivity

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH
Volume 101, Issue 1-2, Pages 256-263

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.02.013

Keywords

Multiphase cloud chemistry; Hydrogen peroxide; Photochemistry

Funding

  1. CNRS-INSU
  2. Federation des Recherches en Environnement of Clermont-Ferrand
  3. Scientific Council of Region Auvergne
  4. Observatoire de Physique du Globe de Clermont-Ferrand (OPGC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The photochemical behaviour of H(2)O(2) in cloud aqueous phase was investigated from a large amount of in situ cloud droplet sampling data. Then we performed laboratory irradiation experiments of real cloud samples, free from gaseous chemistry, in order to factorise between gas phase and liquid phase photochemical reactions. H(2)O(2) was revealed to be sensitive to solar radiation, with higher concentrations during the day. H(2)O(2) was dependent on the degree of air mass pollution with anthropogenic influences leading to lower values of aqueous H(2)O(2). We observed higher differences between day and night of H(2)O(2) concentrations for air masses influenced by anthropogenic activities (mainly Northern direction) compared to those form remote areas (oceanic). Contrary to this field diurnal trend, during laboratory irradiation experiments of the cloud aqueous phase, the concentration showed a regular linear decrease leading to the conclusion that photolysis is more important than photoproduction in cloud aqueous phase. So the diurnal cycle observed during field measurements is due to the high mass transfer from gas phase to liquid phase favoured by the high dispersion of liquid phase and the high solubility of hydrogen peroxide. As a consequence. H(2)O(2) can act as a photochemical source of center dot OH radicals in cloud aqueous phase. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available