4.6 Article

Overexpression and ribozyme-mediated targeting of transcriptional coactivators CREB-binding protein and p300 revealed their indispensable roles in adipocyte differentiation through the regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 277, Issue 19, Pages 16906-16912

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M200585200

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cAMP-response element-binding protein-binding protein (CBP) and p300 are common coactivators for several transcriptional factors. It has been reported that both CDP and p300 are significant for the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma), which is a crucial nuclear receptor in adipogenesis. However, it remains unclear whether CDP and/or p300 is physiologically essential to the activation of PPARgamma in adipocytes and adipocyte differentiation. In this study, we investigated the physiological significance of CBP/p300 in NIH3T3 cells transiently expressing PPARgamma and CDP and in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes stably expressing CDP- or p300-specific ribozymes. In PPARgamma-transfected NIH3T3 cells, induction of expression of PPARgamma target genes such as adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein (aP2) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL) by adding thiazolidinedione was enhanced, depending on the amount of a CDP expression plasmid transfected. Expression of aP2 and LPL genes, as well as glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity and triacylglyceride accumulation after adipogenic induction, was largely suppressed in 3T3-L1 adipocytes expressing either the CDP- or p300-specific active ribozyme, but not in inactive ribozyme-expressing cells. These data suggest that both CDP and p300 are indispensable for the full activation of PPARgamma and adipocyte differentiation and that CDP and p300 do not mutually complement in the process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available