4.6 Article

Control of Ser2448 phosphorylation in the mammalian target of rapamycin by insulin and skeletal muscle load

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 277, Issue 20, Pages 17657-17662

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M201142200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR-41180] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-52753] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have investigated the effects of insulin, amino acids, and the degree of muscle loading on the phosphorylation of Ser(2448), a site in the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) phosphorylated by protein kinase B (PKB) in vitro. Phosphorylation was assessed by immunoblotting with a phosphospecific antibody (antiSer(P)(2448)) and with mTAb1, an activating antibody whose binding is inhibited by phosphorylation in the region of mTOR that contains Ser(2448). Incubating rat diaphragm muscles with insulin increased Ser(2448) phosphorylation but did not change the total amount of mTOR. Insulin, but not amino acids, activated PKB, as evidenced by increased phosphorylation of both Ser(308). and Thr(473) in the kinase. Ser(2448) phosphorylation was also modulated by muscle-loading. Overloading the rat plantaris muscle by synergist muscle ablation, which promotes hypertrophy of the plantaris muscle, increased Ser(2448) phosphorylation. In contrast, unloading the gastrocnemius muscle by hindlimb suspension, which promotes atrophy of the muscle, decreased Ser(2448) phosphorylation, an effect that was fully reversible. Neither overloading nor hindlimb suspension significantly changed the total amount of mTOR. In summary, our results demonstrate that atrophy and hypertrophy of skeletal muscle are associated with decreases and increases in Ser(2448) phosphorylation, suggesting that modulation of this site may have an important role in the control of protein synthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available