4.7 Article

Concentrations of NO2, SO2, and benzene across Hanoi measured by passive diffusion samplers

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages 66-73

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.036

Keywords

City background; Hot spot; Ordinary kriging; Motorbike; Exhaust emission regulation

Funding

  1. SwissContact, Switzerland through the Swiss-Vietnamese Clean Air Program (SVCAP)
  2. Hanoi Center for Environmental Monitoring and Analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concentrations of NO2, SO2, and benzene were measured by passive diffusion samplers at 96 sites across Hanoi consisting of 80 sites in the inner city background, 6 traffic hot spots, 5 industry hot spots, and 5 rural sites. Two sampling campaigns were conducted in the winter and summer seasons of 2007, and the average concentration of the two campaigns was used as a proxy for the annual mean. The annual means of NO2, SO2, and benzene in the inner city background ranged from 17.9 to 65.9 mu g m(-3), 11.7-47.4 mu g m(-3), and 3.5 to 15.4 mu g m(-3), respectively. The NO2/benzene and SO2 concentrations were higher at the traffic and industry hot spots, respectively. The background concentrations of NO2 and benzene tended to increase with the population density and were highest in crowded Hanoi downtown areas. These areas are facing high risks of violating the national legislation threshold for NO2 (40 mu g(-3)). The SO2 background concentrations were generally below the legislation threshold (50 mu g(-3)). Motorbikes, which dominate the Hanoi vehicle fleet, are the main polluters of NO2 and benzene, whereas SO2 comes mainly from diesel buses and trucks, except in some areas that are directly affected by industrial coal burning. Stringently regulating the exhaust emissions of vehicles, especially for motorbikes, and reducing the sulfur and benzene contents in fuels could be implemented to improve Hanoi's air quality. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available