4.6 Article

Delineation of the key amino acids involved in neutrophil inhibitory factor binding to the I-domain supports a mosaic model for the capacity of integrin αMβ2 to recognize multiple ligands

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 277, Issue 21, Pages 18769-18776

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110242200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 66197] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To gain insight into the mechanism by which the alpha(M)I-domain of integrin alpha(M)beta(2) interacts with multiple and unrelated ligands, the identity of the neutrophil inhibitory factor (NIF) recognition site was sought. A systematic strategy in which individual amino acid residues within three previously implicated segments were changed to those in the alpha(L)I-domain, which is structurally very similar but does not bind NIF, was implemented. The capacity of the resulting mutants, expressed as glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins, to recognize NIF was assessed. These analyses ultimately identified Asp(149), Arg(151), Gly(207), Tyr(252), and Glu(258) as critical for NIF binding. Cation binding, a function of the metal ion-dependent adhesion site (MIDAS) motif, was assessed by terbium luminescence to evaluate conformational perturbations induced by the mutations. All five mutants bound terbium with unaltered affinities. When the five residues were inserted into the alpha(L)I-domain, the chimera bound NIF with high affinity. Another ligand of alpha(M)beta(2) C3bi, which is known to use the same segments of the alpha(M)I-domain in engaging the receptor, failed to bind to the chimeric alpha(L)I-domain. Thus, the alpha(M)I-domain appears to present a mosaic of exposed amino acids within surface loops on its MIDAS face, and different ligands interact with different residues to attain high affinity binding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available