4.5 Article

Immunological relationship between Neospora caninum and Besnoitia besnoiti

Journal

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages 35-43

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00030-4

Keywords

cattle-protozoa; Neospora caninum; Besnoitia besnoiti; serology; gerbil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neospora caninum is a coccidian parasite identified as a major cause of abortion in cattle. A combined infection of N. caninum with another taxonomically related parasite of cattle, Besnoitia besnoiti can occur in geographical areas endemic for both species. Both infections are routinely diagnosed serologically, and incorrect diagnosis could occur if immunological cross-reactivity exists between the two parasites. To investigate the possible degree of cross-reactivity, we compared results obtained with two serological techniques, immunofluorescent antibody test (IFA), and Western blot analysis on known positive and negative sera. The test sera were derived from naturally infected cattle and from experimentally infected Mongolian gerbils. In IFA of bovine sera, no cross-reactivity was detected at the commonly used serum dilution cutoffs of 1:200 for N. caninum and 1:256 for B. besnoiti. However, at 1:64 dilution of both cattle and gerbil sera, anti-N. caninum sera reacted with B. besnoiti antigen in some individual samples. Anti-B. besnoiti serum did not react with N. caninum antigen at any dilution. This low level one directional cross-reactivity was confirmed by Western blot analysis. B. besnoiti antigen showed two immunoreactive bands when probed with anti-N. caninum serum, while no bands appeared when N. caninum antigen was probed with B. besnoiti antiserum. Immunization and challenge experiments in the highly susceptible Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) showed essentially no cross-protection between N. caninum and B. besnoiti. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available