4.7 Article

Positive relationship between liquid cloud droplet effective radius and aerosol optical depth over Eastern China from satellite data

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 244-253

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.024

Keywords

Aerosol optical depth; Cloud effective radius; Eastern China

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA05100000]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB955800]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41175030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Correlations between water cloud effective radius (CER) and aerosol optical depth (AOD) from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) are examined over seven sub-regions in Eastern China for 2003-2012. Water phase cloud is defined as having a cloud top pressure greater than 800 hPa. Significant negative correlation coefficients (r = -0.79 similar to -0.94) between AOD and CER are derived over the East Sea and the South China Sea for grid cells with AOD < 0.3. However, positive correlations (r = 0.01-0.91) are calculated for cells with AOD > 0.3. In contrast, significant positive correlations (r = 0.67-0.95) are derived over the Eastern China mainland and Yellow Sea. Further analysis for North China Plain shows that variations in wind speed and relative humidity may account for such positive correlations. Southerly winds carry high levels of pollutants and abundant water vapor, resulting in coincident increases in both AOD and CER in North China Plain, while the northerly winds transport dry and clean air from high latitudes, leading to decreases in AOD and CER. Both processes contribute to the positive correlations between AOD and CER over Eastern China, suggesting that the influence of background weather conditions need to be considered when studying the interactions between aerosol and cloud. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available