4.7 Article

Establishing a conceptual model for photochemical ozone pollution in subtropical Hong Kong

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages 208-220

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.051

Keywords

Conceptual model; Ozone; Regional; Super-regional; Hong Kong

Funding

  1. HKEPD
  2. Postgraduate Studentship (RPHU) of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University
  3. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region [PolyU5179/09E, N_PolyU545/09]
  4. Hong Kong Polytechnic University [A-PK25, 1-ZV7A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Photochemical ozone (O-3) formation is related to its precursors and meteorological conditions. A conceptual model of O-3 air pollution is developed based on the analysis of data obtained at Tung Chung (TC) in Hong Kong. By comparing meteorological parameters between O-3 and non-O-3 episode days, it was found that high temperatures, strong solar radiation, low wind speeds and relative humidity, northeasterly and/or north-westerly prevailing winds were favorable for the O-3 formation, while tropical cyclones were most conducive to the occurrence of O-3 episodes. Backward trajectories simulation and graphical illustration of O-3 pollution suggested that super-regional (i.e. central and eastern China) and regional (i.e. Pearl River Delta, southern China) transport was another factor that contributed to high O-3 levels in Hong Kong. The photochemical O-3 formation, generally VOC-limited in Hong Kong, was controlled by a small number of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Furthermore, the positive matrix factorization (PMF) simulation suggested that solvent usage and vehicular emissions are the major contributors to ambient VOCs in Hong Kong. Finally, this paper presents recommendations for further O-3 research and implementation of O-3 control strategies. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available