4.7 Article

Levels of phthalate esters in settled house dust from urban dwellings with young children in Nanjing, China

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 258-264

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.12.029

Keywords

Urban house dust; Phthalate ester; Child exposure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81072268]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK2010535]
  3. Jiangsu Postdoctoral Research Funds [1001017C]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the levels and possible determinants of phthalate esters (PEs) in settled house dust from urban dwellings with young children, dust was collected from 215 urban houses in Nanjing, China, and 145 outdoor settled dust samples were collected nearby. Six PEs were measured by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. All PEs were detected in the dust from approximately 90% of the houses, with the exception of dioctyl phthalate (DOP), which had only a 59% detection rate. Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) and di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) were the most abundant PEs, with geometric means of 110 and 16.4 mu g g(-1), respectively, and maximal concentrations 9950 and 2150 mu g g(-1). Factor analysis showed that DBP, DEHP and benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP) might come from the same source and were significantly influenced by the use of solid-wood floor wax. High BBP, DEHP, DOP and total PE levels were associated with indices of dampness, and high DOP was associated with humidifier use. In conclusion, six PEs are ubiquitous in urban settled house dust in Nanjing, China, and both plastic materials and cosmetic and personal care products are important sources. Flooring material, dampness and humidifier use potentially influence house dust PE levels. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available