4.1 Article

Release probability is regulated by the size of the readily releasable vesicle pool at excitatory synapses in hippocampus

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 20, Issue 3-5, Pages 225-236

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0736-5748(02)00015-1

Keywords

synaptic transmission; release probability; hippocampal slices

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [P01 HD38760, P30 HD38985, P30 HD038985, P01 HD038760] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synapses in the central nervous system can be very unreliable: stimulation of an individual synapse by an action potential often does not lead to release of neurotransmitter. The probability of transmitter release is not always the same, however, which enables the average strength of synaptic transmission to be regulated by modulation of release probability. Release probability is believed to be determined by the number of fusion competent vesicles (the readily releasable vesicle pool) and the release probability per vesicle. Studies from single synapses have shown that release probability correlates with the size of the readily releasable pool of vesicles across the population of excitatory CA3-CA1 synapses, both in hippocampal slices and in cultured cells. Here I present evidence that the same relationship exists between release probability and the size of the readily releasable vesicle pool within individual synapses, further suggesting that the size of the readily releasable pool helps determine release probability. In addition, using a simple model, I examine how both the number of readily releasable vesicles and the average release probability per vesicle change during trains of high frequency stimulation, and present evidence for non-uniformity of the release probability among vesicles. (C) 2002 ISDN. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available