4.5 Article

Nicotine increases hepatic oxygen uptake in the isolated perfused rat liver by inhibiting glycolysis

Journal

Publisher

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.301.3.930

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nicotine influences energy metabolism, yet mechanisms remain unclear. Since the liver is one of the largest organs and performs many metabolic functions, the goal of this study was to determine whether nicotine would affect respiration and other metabolic functions in the isolated perfused liver. Infusion of 85 muM nicotine caused a rapid 10% increase in oxygen uptake over basal values of 105+/-5 mumol/g/h in perfused livers from fed rats, and an increase of 27% was observed with 850 muM nicotine. Concomitantly, rates of glycolysis of 105+/-8 mumol/g/h were decreased to 52+/-9 mumol/g/h with nicotine, whereas ketone body production was unaffected. Nicotine had no effect on oxygen uptake in glycogen-depleted livers from 24-h fasted rats. Furthermore, addition of glucose to perfused livers from fasted rats partially restored the stimulatory effect of nicotine. Infusion of atractyloside, potassium cyanide, or glucagon blocked the nicotine-induced increase in respiration. Intracellular calcium was increased in isolated hepatocytes by nicotine, a phenomenon prevented by incubation of cells with d-tubocurarine, a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist. Respiration was also increased similar to30% in hepatocytes isolated from fed rats by nicotine, whereas hepatocytes isolated from fasted rats showed little response. In the presence of N-[2-(p-bromocinnamylamino) ethyl]-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide (H-89), an inhibitor of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase A, nicotine failed to stimulate respiration. These data support the hypothesis that inhibition of glycolysis by nicotine increases oxygen uptake due to an ADP-dependent increase in mitochondrial respiration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available