4.6 Article

Natriuretic peptide receptor-B in adult rat ventricle is predominantly confined to the nonmyocyte population

Journal

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00988.2001

Keywords

cardiomyocytes; fibroblasts; smooth muscle; guanylate cyclase

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-54302] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We assessed the cellular localization and relative concentration of the C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) guanylate cyclase-B (GC-B) receptor in the adult rat heart ventricle by several techniques. In frozen sections of the ventricle, anti-receptor antibody stained the vasculature and cells interstitial to myocytes, but not the myocytes themselves. The same antibody detected GC-B in immunoblots of protein extracts of nonmyocytes, but not myocytes and recognized an equivalent protein in extracts of cultured cardiac fibroblasts, but not A7r5 rat smooth muscle cells. In functional assays, CNP-induced cGMP accumulation per milligram cell protein was an order of magnitude greater in cultured cardiac fibroblasts than in A7r5 smooth muscle cells and two orders of magnitude greater than in freshly isolated cardiac myocytes. Modulation of cGMP accumulation by phosphodiesterases (PDEs) was cell specific as determined by antagonist pharmacological profiles, PDE1 in fibroblasts, PDE2 in A7r5 cells, and PDE3 in myocytes, suggesting that significant but low-level cGMP response to CNP measured in heart myocytes is not due to nonmyocyte contamination. Fibroblasts of cardiac origin do not show an interactive relationship between receptor responsiveness to CNP, cGMP levels, and proliferation-related mitogen-activated signal transduction pathways. Whereas previous reports suggest CNP exerts significant effects in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes, our results suggest that fibroblasts are likely the most responsive cell type (cGMP production) in the adult rat heart.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available