4.3 Article

Empirical Bayes methods and false discovery rates for microarrays

Journal

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 70-86

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.1124

Keywords

multiple comparisons; simultaneous hypothesis tests; a posteriori probability of gene significance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a classic two-sample problem, one might use Wilcoxon's statistic to test for a difference between treatment and control subjects. The analogous microarray experiment yields thousands of Wilcoxon statistics, one for each gene on the array, and confronts the statistician with a difficult Simultaneous inference situation. We will discuss two inferential approaches to this problem: an empirical Bayes method that requires very little a priori Bayesian modeling, and the frequentist method of false discovery rates proposed by Benjamini and Hochberg in 1995. It turns Out that the two methods are closely related and can be used together to produce sensible simultaneous inferences. Genet. Epiderniol. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available