4.4 Article

Fifteen-year time trends in energy and macronutrient intake in German children and adolescents: results of the DONALD study

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages 595-604

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1079/BJN/2002572

Keywords

children; adolescents; energy intake; macronutrient intake; time trend

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The DONALD study (Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed study) gives the opportunity to evaluate long-term food and nutrient intake data on the basis of 3 d weighed dietary records of infants, children and adolescents since 1985. In this paper, we examine changes in energy and macronutrient intakes (protein, fat, saturated, mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids, carbohydrates and added sugars) of 795 2-18-year-old subjects between 1985 and 2000 (4483 records). No significant changes in intakes of energy and of protein, polyunsaturated fatty acids and added sugars (as % energy intake, E %) were found. Fat intake decreased significantly in all age groups (between -0.20 and -0.26 E %/year), as well as intake of saturated fatty acids (between -0.11 and -0.14 E %/year) and monounsaturated fatty acids (between -0.07 and -0.014 E %/year). This decline was compensated for by a significant increase in carbohydrate intake (between +0.18 and +0.27 E %/year). The changes in macronutrient intake were mainly due to a decreased consumption of fats-oils (between -0.29 and -1.26 g/year) and meat-fish-eggs (between -0.21 and -2.92 g/year), whereas consumption of bread-cereals (between +0.12 and +2.42 g/year) and potatoes-pasta-rice (between +0.15 and +2.26 g/year) increased slightly. However, since recommended fat intake and fatty acid composition was not reached at the end of the study period by far, further efforts will be necessary to improve macronutrient composition and to stabilize favourable dietary habits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available