4.6 Article

An evaluation of extubation failure predictors in mechanically ventilated infants and children

Journal

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 752-757

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1306-6

Keywords

weaning; mechanical ventilation; weaning indices; extubation failure; infants; children

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess the accuracy of traditional weaning indices in predicting extubation failure, and to compare their accuracy when indices are measured at the onset of a breathing trial (SBT) and at the end of the SBT before extubation. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Medical-surgical intensive care unit at a tertiary care hospital. Patients: Four hundred eighteen consecutive infants and children who received mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h and were deemed ready to undergo a SBT by their primary physician. Interventions: Respiratory frequency (RR), tidal volume (V-T). maximal inspiratory pressure (P-imax) and frequency-to-tidal volume ratio (f/V-T) were obtained within the first 5 min of breathing through a T-piece. The primary physicians were unaware of those measurements and the decision to extubate a patient was made by them. RR, V-T, f/V-T were remeasured before extubation by the respiratory therapists. Extubation failure was defined as needing re intubation within 48 h after extubation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated for each index as a measure of the accuracy in predicting extubation outcome. Measurements and main results.. Three hundred twenty-three patients Successfully underwent the SBT and were extubated, but 48 of them (14%) required re-intubation. The ROC curve for V-T, RR, P-imax and f/V-T measured within the first 5 min of breathing were 0.54, 0.56, 0,57 and 0.57, respectively. The ROC curve did not increase significantly when the above indices were remeasured before extubation. Conclusion: In a population which had passed SBT, the ability of the traditional weaning indices to discriminate between children successfully extubated and children re-intubated is very poor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available