4.7 Article

Thrombomodulin deficiency in human diabetic nerve microvasculature

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 51, Issue 6, Pages 1957-1963

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.51.6.1957

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [1R01 DK59758-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [1K08NS01595] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human diabetic neuropathy is multifactorial in etiology, with ischemia as a final common pathology. Although impaired vascular endothelial cell function in diabetic microvascular injury is established, the role of thrombomodulin (TM)-dependent protein C antithrombotic mechanism in the pathogenesis of neuropathy is unclear. This neuropathologic case-control study investigated whether vascular endothelial TM expression is deficient in peripheral nerve microvessels in diabetic neuropathy. Sural nerve biopsies from 7 patients with diabetic neuropathy and 10 with axonal neuropathy without vasculopathy were immunostained with anti-TM and anti-von Willebrand factor (vWF; an endothelial cell marker) antibodies. The proportion of TM-positive microvessels was expressed relative to total vWF-staining vessels, according to vessel caliber and regional distribution within the nerve. In diabetic nerves compared with reference controls, the proportion of TM-positive endoneurial microvessels was 15-fold lower (0.02 vs. 0.30 in diabetic nerves vs. controls, P < 0.004), and the proportion of small-caliber epineurial microvessels was 10-fold lower (0.04 vs. 0.43, P < 0.001). No TM expression was detected at the perineurium in diabetic or control nerves. We demonstrate a substantial reduction of vascular endothelial TM expression throughout human diabetic neuropathy. These findings suggest that an impaired native TM-dependent protein C antithrombotic mechanism may contribute to microvascular ischemia in the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available