4.7 Article

Impact of Asian dust events on airborne bacterial community assessed by molecular analyses

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 45, Issue 25, Pages 4313-4321

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.054

Keywords

Ambient culturable bacteria; Bacterial loading factor; DGGE; 16S rDNA clone library; Principal component analysis

Funding

  1. Seoul Metropolitan Government, Republic of Korea [12-65-010]
  2. Korea government (MEST) [2010-0008005, 2010-0001898]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Impact of Asian dust events (ADE) on atmospheric bacterial communities was studied using both cultivation and culture-independent methods. In addition, size-segregated aerosol mass concentrations and their chemical compositions were measured and backward trajectory analysis was performed. During the days affected by ADE, culturable bacterial population levels showed significant positive correlations with total suspended particles (TSP) and particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <10 mu m (PM10), whereas no significant correlation was found during non-Asian dust (NAD) days. Asian dust seemed to directly impact the airborne bacterial communities, as abrupt changes of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE)-band patterns and significant differences in the 16S rDNA clone library between ADE and NAD days were observed. In addition, the changes of DGGE patterns were in agreement with the shift of PM2.5 chemical composition, suggesting that the outdoor bacterial community was affected by the source and transport pathways of air masses. The isolation sources of clone libraries reflected the sampled air mass transport pathways, which were simulated by backward trajectories. The results of this study revealed that the airborne culturable bacterial concentration was significantly increased and the ambient bacterial community structure was abruptly changed during ADE. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available