4.0 Article

Horizontal gene transfer in microbial genome evolution

Journal

THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages 489-495

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.2002.1596

Keywords

informational; operational; complexity hypothesis; genomics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Horizontal gene transfer is the collective name for processes that permit the exchange of DNA among organisms of different species. Only recently has it been recognized as a significant contribution to interorganismal gene exchange. Traditionally, it was thought that microorganisms evolved clonally, passing genes from mother to daughter cells with little or no exchange of DNA among diverse species. Studies of microbial genomes, however, have shown that genomes contain genes that are closely related to a number of different prokaryotes, sometimes to phylogenetically very distantly related ones. (Doolittle et al., 1990, J. Mol. Evol. 31, 383-388; Karlin at aL, 1997, J. Bacteriol. 179, 3899-3913; Karlin et aL, 1998, Annu. Rev. Genet. 32, 185-225; Lawrence and Ochman, 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9413-9417; Rivera et al., 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 95, 6239-6244; Campbell, 2000, Theor. Popul. Biol. 57 71-77; Doolittle, 2000, Sci. Am. 282, 90-95; Ochman and Jones, 2000, Embo. J. 19, 6637-6643; Boucher et aL 2001, Cuff. Opin., Microbiol. 4, 285-289; Wang et al., 2001, Mol. Biol. Evol. 18,792-800). Whereas prokaryotic and eukaryotic evolution was once reconstructed from a single 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene, the analysis of complete genomes is beginning to yield a different picture of microbial evolution, one that is wrought with the lateral movement of genes across vast phylogenetic distances. (Lane et al., 1988, Methods Enzymol. 167, 138-144, Lake and Rivera, 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 91, 2880-2881; Lake et aL, 1999, Science 283, 2027-2028). (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available