4.6 Article

Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus:: variations related to screening strategy used

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 146, Issue 6, Pages 831-837

Publisher

BIO SCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1460831

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in a large general obstetric population and its variations depending on the presence of risk factors, and to evaluate how the gestational diabetes screening strategies applied might modify the observed prevalence in the population. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Methods: The study population was a total of 2 5 74 pregnant women. Information about risk factors, screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes was, obtained. Frequency of risk factors under the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria, and observed and expected prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus were calculated and compared for statistical significance. Results: Age ! 30 years, family history of diabetes, obesity and previous fetal macrosomia were the most frequent risk factors. Under ACOG recommendations, 456% of our general obstetric population would have been exempt from gestational diabetes mellitus screening, as compared with only 15.5% under ADA guidelines. Sixty-five patients were diagnosed as having gestational diabetes mellitus giving an overall prevalence of 2.5% (confidence interval 2.0-3.2). Among the low-risk women, prevalence values were 0.6% and 0.5% respectively under ACOG and ADA criteria, whereas for those presenting one or more risk factors rates were 4% and 2.9% respectively. Conclusions: In our general obstetric population, gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence was found to be approximately six times lower among low-risk gravidae than among the high-risk subjects, suggesting that selective screening might be beneficial. Nevertheless, selective gestational diabetes mellituts screening under ADA criteria seems to entail the same disadvantages as the selective screening strategies without any apparent benefits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available