Journal
ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages 1358-1370Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200206000-00015
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: The authors report a positron emission tomography (PET) study on humans with parallel exploration of the dose-dependent effects of an intravenous (propofol) and a volatile (sevoflurane) anesthetic agent on regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) using quantitative and relative (Statistical Parametric Mapping [SPM]) analysis. Methods: Using (H2O)-O-15, rCBF was assessed in 16 healthy (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] physical status I) volunteers awake and at three escalating drug concentrations: 1, 1.5, and 2 MAC/EC50, or specifically, at either 2, 3, and 4% end-tidal sevoflurane (n = 8), or 6, 9, and 12 mug/ml plasma concentration of propofol (n = 8). Rocuronium was used for muscle relaxation. Results: Both drugs decreased the bispectral index and blood pressure dose-dependently. Comparison between adjacent levels showed that sevoflurane initially (0 vs. 1 MAC) reduced absolute rCBF by 36-53% in all areas, then (1 vs. 1.5 MAC) increased rCBF in the frontal cortex, thalamus, and cerebellum (7-16%), and finally (1.5 vs. 2 MAC) caused a dual effect with a 23% frontal reduction and a 38% cerebellar increase. In the propofol. group, flow was also initially reduced by 62-70%, with minor further effects. In the SPM analysis of the awake to 1 MAC/EC50 step, both anesthetic agents reduced relative rCBF in the cuneus, precuneus, posterior limbic system, and the thalamus or midbrain; additionally, propofol reduced relative rCBF in the parietal and frontal cortices. Conclusions: Both anesthetic agents caused a global reduction of rCBF (propofol > sevoflurane) at the 1 MAC/EC50 level. The effect was maintained at higher propofol. concentrations, whereas 2 MAC sevoflurane caused noticeable flow redistribution. Despite the marked global changes, SPM analysis enabled detailed localization of regions with the greatest relative decreases.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available