4.7 Article

Kinetics of the reactions of soot surface-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with the OH radicals

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 44, Issue 14, Pages 1754-1760

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.007

Keywords

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Soot; OH; Heterogeneous reactivity; Uptake coefficient

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The kinetics of the heterogeneous reaction of OH radicals with 15 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) present in laboratory generated simulated kerosene combustion soot was studied at T = 290 K in a low pressure discharge-flow reactor combined with an electron-impact mass spectrometer. The kinetics of soot-bound PAH consumption in reaction with OH were monitored using off-line HPLC measurements of their concentrations in soot samples as a function of time of exposure to OH. Concentration of OH radicals in the gas phase was measured by mass spectrometry. The first-order rate constants measured for the individual PAH at T = 290 K ranged from 0.02 to 0.04 s(-1) and were found to be independent of the OH concentration ([OH] = (0.34-2.5) x 10(12) molecule cm(-3)) and of the molecular structure of the PAH. In addition, the uptake coefficient of OH on soot surface and the diffusion coefficient of OH in He were measured to be 0.19 +/- 0.03 (calculated with geometric surface area) and (615 +/- 80) Torr cm(2) s(-1), respectively. Comparison of the results on the PAH + OH reaction to those from previous studies carried out on different carbonaceous substrates, indicates probable dependence of the heterogeneous reactivity of PAH toward OH on the substrate nature. Rapid reaction with OH can be an important potential pathway of the atmospheric degradation of non-volatile PAH present mainly in the particulate phase in the atmosphere. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available