4.6 Article

Phase diagrams and dielectric response of epitaxial barium strontium titanate films: A theoretical analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 91, Issue 11, Pages 9288-9296

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.1473675

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We develop phase diagrams for single-domain epitaxial barium strontium titanate films on cubic substrates as a function of the misfit strain based on a Landau-Devonshire phenomenological model similar to the one developed by Pertsev [Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1988 (1998)]. The biaxial epitaxy-induced internal stresses enable phase transformations to unusual ferroelectric phases that are not possible in single crystals and bulk ceramics. The dielectric response of the films is calculated as a function of the misfit strain by taking into account the formation of misfit dislocations that relieve epitaxial stresses during deposition. It is shown that by adjusting the misfit strain via substrate selection and film thickness, a high dielectric response can be obtained, especially in the vicinity of structural instabilities. Theoretical estimation of the dielectric constant of (001) Ba0.7Sr0.3TiO3 and Ba0.6Sr0.4TiO3 films on (001) Si, MgO, LaAlO3, and SrTiO3 substrates as a function of misfit strain and film thickness is provided. An order-of-magnitude increase in the dielectric constant with increasing film thickness is expected for films on LaAlO3 and SrTiO3 substrates. A structural instability around 40 nm is predicted in films on MgO substrates accompanied by a substantial increase in the dielectric constant. For films on MgO substrates thicker than 40 nm, the analysis shows that the dielectric constant decreases significantly. We show that the theoretical approach not only predicts general trends but is also in good quantitative agreement with the experimental data reported in literature. (C) 2002 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available