4.5 Article

Desmoid tumors: A novel approach for local control

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 2, Pages 96-99

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/jso.10104

Keywords

fibromatosis; desmoid tumor; neoadjuvant radiation; recurrence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Objectives: After resection, desmoid tumors are associated with a recurrence rate that is typically 25-50%. Although this is an unusual problem, we instituted a prospective cohort study with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation, followed by surgical resection, in an effort to improve local control. Methods: Between 1985 and 1999, 13 patients with potentially resectable disease were managed with a treatment protocol of preoperative doxorubicin (30 mg continuous infusion daily for 3 days) and radiotherapy . (10 x 300 cGy). Resection was performed 4-6 weeks later. All lesions were resected with an intended margin of I cm, but clear adventitial margins were accepted in order to preserve critical structures. Results: The median follow-up was 71 months (range, 22-109). Six patients (46%) presented after failure of a previous surgery. Clear microscopic margins were obtained in 11 patients, and 2 patients had positive margins. There were two local recurrences (15% local recurrence). Both recurrences followed resection of large thigh lesions, which appeared at 30 and 49 months of follow-up. In one patient with a chest wall tumor, two new primary desmoid tumors developed outside the treatment area, in the ipsilateral arm and forearm. Eleven patients have been disease free for a median of 71 months (range, 22-109). Conclusions: For potentially resectable lesions, this protocol provides excellent local control, even in those with recurrent disease. Neoadjuvant treatment with doxorubicin and radiotherapy appears to be a better option than surgery alone, or surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. These results need to be confirmed in larger, prospective randomized trials. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available