4.7 Article

Comparison of manual and automated chambers for field measurements of N2O, CH4, CO2 fluxes from cultivated land

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 43, Issue 11, Pages 1888-1896

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.12.031

Keywords

Automated and manual methods; Carbon dioxide; Nitrous oxide; Methane; Rice-wheat rotation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40425010]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-yw-204, KZCX3-SW-440]
  3. European Union [IP 017841]
  4. Helmholtz Society via the joined Sino-German Laboratory ENTRANCE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chamber techniques can easily be applied to field trials with multiple small plots measuring carbon- and nitrogen-trace gas fluxes. Nevertheless, such chamber measurements are usually made weekly and rarely more frequently than once daily. However, automatic chambers do allow flux measurements on sub-daily time scales. It has been hypothesized that sub-daily measurements provide more reliable results, as diurnal variations are captured better compared to manual measurements. To test this hypothesis we compared automatic and manual measurements of N2O, CO2 and CH4 fluxes from tilled and non-tilled plots of a rice-wheat rotation ecosystem over a non-waterlogged period. Our results suggest that both techniques, i.e., either manual or automatic chambers of N2O and CO2 emissions resulted in biased fluxes. The manual measurements were adequate to capture either day-to-day or seasonal dynamics of N2O, CO2 and CH4 exchanges, but overestimated the cumulative N2O and CO2 emissions by 18% and 31%, respectively. This was due to neglecting temperature-dependent diurnal variations of C and N trace gas fluxes. However, the automatic measurements underestimated the cumulative emissions of N2O and CO2 by 22% and 17%, respectively. This underestimation resulted from chamber effects upon soil moisture during rainfall processes. No significant difference was detected between the two methods in CH4 exchanges over the non-waterlogged soils. The bias of manual chambers may be significant when pronounced diurnal variations occur. The bias of automatic measurements can only be avoided/minimized if chamber positions are frequently changed and/or if chambers are automatically opened during rainfall events. We therefore recommend using automatic chambers together with continuous measurements of soil chamber Moisture to allow for soil moisture correction of fluxes or to correct flux estimates as derived by manual chambers for possible diurnal variations. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available