4.5 Article

Exercise training enhances baroreflex control of heart rate by a vagal mechanism in rabbits with heart failure

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 6, Pages 2403-2408

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00039.2002

Keywords

autonomic regulation; vagus

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P0-1 HL-62222] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Moderate exercise training (Ex) enhances work capacity and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). We investigated the autonomic components of resting heart rate (HR) and the baroreflex control of HR in conscious, instrumented rabbits with pacing-induced CHF after Ex. Sham and CHF rabbits were exercise trained for 4 wk at 15-18 m/min, 6 days/wk. Arterial pressure and HR were recorded before and after metoprolol (1 mg/kg iv) or after atropine (0.2 mg/kg iv). Mean arterial pressure was altered by infusions of sodium nitroprusside and phenylephrine. The data were fit to a sigmoid (logistic) function. Baseline HRs were 266.5+/-8.4 and 232.1+/-1.6 beats/min in CHF and CHF Ex rabbits, respectively (P<0.05). In the unblocked state, CHF rabbits had a significantly depressed peak baroreflex slope (1.7 +/- 0.3 vs. 5.6 +/- 0.7 beats.min(-1).mmHg(-1); P<0.001) and HR range (128.6+/-34.5 vs. 253.2+/-20.3 beats/min; P<0.05) compared with normal subjects. Ex increased baroreflex slope to 4.9 +/- 0.3 from 1.7 +/- 0.3 beats.min(-1).mmHg(-1) in unblocked rabbits (P<0.001 compared with CHF non-Ex). Ex did not alter baroreflex function in sham animals. After metoprolol, baroreflex slope was significantly increased in CHF Ex rabbits (1.5+/-0.2 vs. 3.0+/-0.2 beats.min(-1).mmHg(-1); P<0.05). After atropine, there was no significant change in baroreflex slope or HR range between CHF Ex and CHF rabbits. These data support the view that enhancement of baroreflex control of HR after Ex is due to an augmentation of vagal tone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available