4.6 Article

Postoperative nausea and vomiting after craniotomy for tumor surgery: A comparison between awake craniotomy and general anesthesia

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 279-283

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0952-8180(02)00354-9

Keywords

awake craniotomy; nausea and vomiting; neuroanesthesia; tumor surgery

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study Objective: To assess the frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONT) in Patients following an awake craniotomy compared to general anesthesia for tumor surgery. Design: Prospective observation at and chart review of all patients having a craniotomy for tumor during one Tear. Setting: Postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital. Patients: 187 patients were reviewed. 107 patients who had a craniotomy for supratentorial tumor that was less than six hours in duration were analyzed and compared (50 awake craniotomy vs. 57 general anesthesia). Interventions: Medical records were reviewed for events after the first four hours until discharge. The occurrence and the time of any nausea, vomiting; the administration of antiemetics and analgesic drugs; and complications were documented. Measurements: Frequency of nausea, vomiting, administration of antiemetics and analgesia, and outcome between the two groups were compared using Chi-square and Student's t-test. Main Results : The frequency of nausea (4% vs. 23%; p = 0.012) and vomiting (0% vs. 11%; P = 0.052) were less in patients having an awake craniotomy compared to general anesthesia, but only during the first four hours. The administration of postoperative analgesia was not different between the two groups and did not influence the frequency of PONV. Conclusion: Thefrequency of PONV during the initial recovery phase was less in patients having an awake craniotomy for tumor surgery than in patients having a similar procedure with general anesthesia. (C) 2002 by Elsevier Science Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available