4.7 Article

Spatio-temporal modeling of chronic PM10 exposure for the nurses' health study

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 42, Issue 18, Pages 4047-4062

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.044

Keywords

air pollution; particulate matter; geographic information system; spatial smoothing; generalized additive models

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [P01 ES009825, P30 ES000002, P01 ES009825-099001] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [P01ES009825, P30ES000002] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic epidemiological studies of airborne particulate matter (PM) have typically characterized the chronic PM exposures of their study populations using city- or county-wide ambient concentrations, which limit the studies to areas where nearby monitoring data are available and which ignore within-city spatial gradients in ambient PM concentrations. To provide more spatially refined and precise chronic exposure measures, we used a Geographic Information System (GIS)-based spatial smoothing model to predict monthly outdoor PM10 concentrations in the northeastern and midwestern United States. This model included monthly smooth spatial terms and smooth regression terms of GIS-derived and meteorological predictors. Using cross-validation and other pre-specified selection criteria, terms for distance to road by road class, urban land use, block group and county population density, point- and area-source PM10 emissions, elevation, wind speed, and precipitation were found to be important determinants of PM10 concentrations and were included in the final model. Final model performance was strong (cross-validation R-2 = 0.62), with little bias (-0.4 mu g m(-3)) and high precision (6.4 mu g m(-3)). The final model (with monthly spatial terms) performed better than a model with seasonal spatial terms (cross-validation R-2 = 0.54). The addition of GlS-derived and meteorological predictors improved predictive performance over spatial smoothing (cross-validation R-2 = 0.51) or inverse distance weighted interpolation (crossvalidation R-2 = 0.29) methods alone and increased the spatial resolution of predictions. The model performed well in both rural and urban areas, across seasons, and across the entire time period. The strong model performance demonstrates its suitability as a means to estimate individual- specific chronic PM10 exposures for large populations. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available