4.7 Article

Clinical efficacy of sitaxsentan, an endothelin-A receptor antagonist, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension - Open-label pilot study

Journal

CHEST
Volume 121, Issue 6, Pages 1860-1868

Publisher

AMER COLL CHEST PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.1378/chest.121.6.1860

Keywords

clinical trials; endothelin; hypertension, pulmonary; pulmonary heart disease

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR-00645] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of sitaxsentan, an endothelin-A receptor antagonist, in a 12-week, open-label trial of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Patients: Six children and 14 adults with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II, III, or IV primary pulmonary hypertension or PAH associated with either congenital systemic-to-pulmonary shunts or collagen vascular disease were enrolled. Measurements: Sitaxsentan was administered orally at 100 to 500 mg bid for 12 weeks. Cardiopulmonary hemodynamics via cardiac catheterization were obtained at baseline and week 12. Six-minute walk test distance was measured at baseline, week 6, and week 12. Results: Sitaxsentan treatment resulted in significant improvement in exercise capacity as assessed by the 6-min walk distance (baseline [mean +/- SD], 466 +/- 132 m; week 12, 515 +/- 141 m, n = 20, p = 0.006). Mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance index also improved (63 +/- 20 to 52 +/- 22 mm Hg, n = 17, p = 0.0002; and 20 +/- 11 to 14 +/- 13 U x m(2), n = 17, p = 0.008, respectively). Serious adverse events included two cases of acute hepatitis (fatal in one patient). Conclusions: Patients with NYHA functional class II, III, or IV PAH showed a significant improvement in exercise capacity and cardiopulmonary hemodynamics over a 12-week period of treatment with sitaxsentan, an endothelin-A receptor antagonist. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sitaxsentan in patients with PAH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available