4.7 Article

Size-differentiated source profiles for fugitive dust in the Chinese Loess Plateau

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 42, Issue 10, Pages 2261-2275

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.12.041

Keywords

size differentiation; source profiles; loess; Asian dust; China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Size-differentiated fugitive dust chemical source profiles are determined for the Chinese Loess Plateau, it major source of Asian dust. Fifteen loess samples at five sites (Yulin, Yanchi, Huanxian, Luochuan, and Xi'an) were collected, dried, sieved, resuspended, and sampled through TSP, PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 inlets onto filters for analysis of 40 major and trace elements (Na to U), six ions (Cl-, NO3-, SO42-, Na+, K+, and NH4+), organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EQ, and carbonate carbon CO3-C). The abundances of major species (> 1%) include Al, Si, K, Ca, Fe, OC and CO3-C, in four size-differentiated source profiles. OC accounted for similar to 90% of total carbon in four size fractions for most of the profiles. Enrichment factors indicated that the 18 elements (Na, Mg, Si, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Rb, Sr, Y, Zr, Bit) found in the samples were dominated by crustal sources. Enrichment factors for Co, As, Se, Mo, Cd, In, Sb, and T1 are one to two orders of magnitude larger than crustal-derived elements, suggesting the influence of anthropogenic pollution SO42-, sources. Compared with loess samples, V, Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Sb, 4 and NOT are enriched in ambient PM2.5 aerosol samples, implying that Asian dust contains pollution components in downwind regions of the desert. The elemental ratios of Si, K, Ca, Ti, Mn, and Fe to Al in Asian dust source regions compared well with those found at downwind regions such as Korea, Japan, and the North Pacific. These ratios can be used its fingerprints to trace the transport path of Asian dust. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available