4.5 Article

Promoter switch:: a novel mechanism causing biallelic PEG1/MEST expression in invasive breast cancer

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages 1449-1453

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/11.12.1449

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have previously reported on the biallelic expression of the imprinted PEG1/MEST gene in infiltrating carcinomas of the breast. Putative loss of imprinting (LOI) of PEG1/MEST has subsequently also been implicated in the aetiology of lung adenocarcinomas and colon cancer. Taking advantage of our previous study, identifying seven infiltrating carcinomas of the breast, displaying biallelic PEG1/MEST expression, we have analysed the allelic usage of the two alternative PEG1/MEST transcripts encoding isoforms 1 and 2, separately. In addition, expression levels of the two transcripts have been measured by real-time RTPCR, in order to elucidate the mechanism behind the switch from monoallelic transcription in normal breast tissue to biallelic expression in invasive cancer. The isoform 1 transcript is imprinted in both the paired normal tissue and the breast carcinomas. In contrast, the isoform 2 transcript is biallelically expressed, or in one case expressed from the opposite allele to isoform 1, raising the possibility that isoform 2 is polymorphically imprinted in normal breast tissue. In all the paired normal samples, isoform 1 is predominantly expressed, explaining the monoallelic profiles of these samples. However, in four of the seven biallelic carcinomas, isoform 2 is expressed at higher levels than isoform 1, indicating that a switch in expression from isoform 1 to isoform 2 is responsible for the biallelic profiles in these samples. Our results not only suggest a novel mechanism leading to biallelic expression detected when analysing the common 3'-UTR of the PEG1/MEST transcriptional unit, they are also indicative of the existence of further alternative PEG1/MEST transcripts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available