4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Retrospective, longitudinal, and cross sectional study of visual acuity impairment in choroideraemia

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages 658-662

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.86.6.658

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [P30 EY001792, EY01792] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/aims: Few studies have reported on the change in visual acuity (VA) in patients with chorcideraemia. In order to determine the degree and rate of VA impairment associated with this disease, the central VA was analysed in a large group of patients with chorolderoemia. Methods: The authors completed a retrospective, cross sectional review of 115 patients with choroidauthors eraemia from three tertiary care centres. A longitudinal analysis was performed on 45 of these patients I who met the inclusion criteria of at least three visits over a minimum period of 4.5 years. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore the 5 year rate of VA change while controlling for initial VA and initial age. Multiple logistic regression was also used to investigate VA impairment. Results: In the cross sectional group (n = 115), 84% (87/103) of patients under the age of 60 had a VA of 20/40 or better while 33% (4/12) of patients 60 years of age or older had a VA of 20/200 or worse at their most recent visit. The majority of the patients (93%) in the longitudinal subgroup of 45 patients had a VA of 20/30 or better at their initial visit. The mean 5 year rate of VA change was 0.09 IcgMAR equivalent (approximately one line on the Lighthouse chart). Conclusion: In this cohort of patients with choroideroemia, there was typically a slow rate of VA loss I and the prognosis for central VA retention was, as a group, favourable until the seventh decade.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available