4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The clinical therapeutic window for luteinizing hormone in controlled ovarian stimulation

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages 1170-1177

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03157-6

Keywords

follicle-stimulating hormone; folliculogenesis; luteinizing hormone; ovulation induction; in vitro fertilization; LH threshold

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To discuss the clinical therapeutic window for LH during the follicular phase. Design: Review of selected papers that were retrieved through a Medline search and a review of clinical trials, the results of which are in the process of publication. Patient(s): Women undergoing infertility treatment. Intervention (s): Recombinant human LH (r-hLH) was administered SIC as a supplement to FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Main Outcome Measure(s): Folficular development, E-2 production, and endometrial thickness. Result(s): Optimal follicular maturation is the result of both FSH and LH stimulation. In patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, 75 IU of r-hLH and 150 IU of FSH per day resulted in more follicles and provided sufficient E-2 for optimal endometrial proliferation. Additional r-hLH (>250 IU/day), in patients with either hypogonadotropic hypogonadism or polycystic ovary disease, may precipitate a series of deleterious physiological actions leading to atresia of developing follicles. Adding r-hLH to FSH in women treated with GnRH agonist showed no benefits in terms of number of mature oocytes, fertilization, and cleavage. However, those who experience profound pituitary desensitization may benefit from adding LH to the stimulation protocol. No obvious clinical criteria have been established to define this group of patients. Conclusion(s): A threshold and ceiling level for LH (therapeutic window) is proposed. below which E, production is not adequate and above which LH may be detrimental to follicular development. (C) 2002 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available