Comments on 'Concentration by evaporation and the prebiotic synthesis of cytosine'

The claim by Nelson et al. (2001) that the reaction of cyanoacetaldehyde and urea provides `an efficient prebiotic synthesis' of cytosine is disputed. The authors have not dealt with the important points presented in a criticism of this reaction (Shapiro, 1999): (1) The reactants undergo side reactions with common nucleophiles that appear to proceed more rapidly than cytosine formation, and (2) No reactions have been described thus far that would produce cytosine at a rate sufficient to compensate for its decomposition by deamination, and permit accumulation over extended periods of time. Instead, Nelson et al. have conducted 'drying-down' experiments, in an effort to simulate evaporations on the early Earth, but the design of these experiments is flawed. The initial reactant concentrations are much higher than might be expected in a natural setting, and potentially interfering substances such as glycine, cyanide and thiols have been excluded. 'Drying beaches and drying lagoons' have been invoked as sites for such a reaction but no effort has been made to describe the characteristics of such sites or to estimate their frequency with reference to the present Earth. In the absence of contradictory data, the conclusion put forward in Shapiro (1999) remains valid: 'It was quite unlikely that cytosine played a role in the origin of life'.