4.6 Article

Cardioprotection by breathing hyperoxic gas -: relation to oxygen concentration and exposure time in rats and mice

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 987-994

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1010-7940(02)00125-2

Keywords

cardiac contractile function; cardioprotection; hyperoxia; ischaemia-reperfusion injury of the heart; myocardial infarction; preconditioning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Breathing a hyperoxic gas (greater than or equal to95% O-2) protects against ischaemia-reperfusion injury in rat and mouse hearts. The present study investigated how oxygen concentration and duration of hyperoxic exposure influenced cardioprotection, and whether hyperoxia might induce delayed cardioprotection (after 24 h). Methods: Animals were kept in normal air or in a hyperoxic environment, and their hearts were isolated and Langendorff-perfused immediately or 24 h thereafter. Global ischaemia was induced for 25 min in rats and 40 min in mice, followed by 60 min of reperfusion. Infarct size was determined by triphenyl tetrazolium chloride staining. Results: In rats exposure to greater than or equal to95, 80, and 60%, but not to 40% of oxygen immediately before heart isolation and perfusion improved postischaemic functional recovery. Eighty or more percent of oxygen also reduced infarct size. A preconditioning-like effect could be evoked by 60 or 180 min of hyperoxia, giving both immediate and delayed protection. In the mouse heart protection could be induced by pretreatment for 15 or 30, but not by 60 min with greater than or equal to95% oxygen. The protective effect of hyperoxia in mice could be evoked in the immediate model only. Conclusions: Hyperoxia protects the isolated rat and mouse heart against ischaemia-reperfusion injury, but some species-different responses exist. The protection depends on both oxygen concentration in inspired air, and duration of hyperoxic exposure. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available