4.5 Article

Expression of ER-α and ER-β in the hamster ovary:: Differential regulation by gonadotropins and ovarian steroid hormones

Journal

ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 143, Issue 6, Pages 2385-2398

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.143.6.2385

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD-28165] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spatiotemporal expression patterns of ER-alpha and ER-beta protein and mRNA in hamster ovarian cells during the estrous cycle and following hypophysectomy and selective hormone replacement were evaluated by immunofluorescence, immunoblotting and in situ hybridization analyses. Whereas ER-beta mRNA and protein expression predominated in granulosa cells and ER-alpha expression was in interstitial and thecal cells, overlap in receptor subtype expression across cell types was evident. Both ER subtypes were present from primordial follicle stage onward. ER-alpha mRNA levels and immunoreactivity started increasing from 133:0900 h in intersitial and granulosa cells and peaked on the proestrous (D4:0900 h). Regionalized higher expression of ER-alpha in granulosa cells in and around the forming antrum was evident. Surface epithelial cells were also positive. ER-beta mRNA and protein expression increased markedly in granulosa and interstitial cells on 132:0900 h, reached a peak on 133:0900 h, and then declined sharply on 134:0900 h. No change in ER expression occurred following the preovulatory gonadotropin surge. Whereas FSH or human CG stimulated ER-alpha mRNA and protein expression in hypophysectomized hamsters, only FSH could stimulate ER-beta mRNA and protein, and the effect was significantly attenuated by human CG. ER expression was stimulated by estrogen, but progesterone strongly inhibited estrogen action. These results indicate that ER expression is cell type specific to the larger extent and is critically regulated by reproductive hormones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available