4.7 Article

Identification and in vitro biological activities of hop proanthocyanidins: Inhibition of nNOS activity and scavenging of reactive nitrogen species

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 50, Issue 12, Pages 3435-3443

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf0116202

Keywords

proanthocyanidins; procyanidins; catechin; nitric oxide synthase; peroxynitrite; SIN-1; TBARS; antioxidants; hops; Humulus lupulus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oligomeric proanthocyanidins constitute a group of water-soluble polyphenolic tannins that are present in the female inflorescences (up to 5% dry wt) of the hop plant (Humulus lupulus). Humans are exposed to hop proanthocyanidins through consumption of beer. Proanthocyanidins from hops were characterized for their chemical structure and their in vitro biological activities. Chemically, they consist mainly of oligomeric catechins ranging from dimers to octamers, with minor amounts of catechin oligomers containing one or two gallocatechin units. The chemical structures of four procyanidin dimers (131, B2, B3, and B4) and one trimer, epicatechin-(4beta-->8)-catechin-(4alpha-->8)-catechin (TR), were elucidated using mass spectrometry, NMR spectroscopy, and chemical degradation. When tested as a mixture, the hop oligomeric proanthocyanidins (PC) were found to be potent inhibitors of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) activity. Among the oligomers tested, procyanidin B2 was most inhibitory against nNOS activity. Procyanidin 133, catechin, and epicatechin were noninhibitory against nNOS activity. PC and the individual oligomers were all strong inhibitors of 3-morpholinosydnonimine (SIN-1)-induced oxidation of LDL, with procyanidin B3 showing the highest antioxidant activity at 0.1 mug/mL. The catechin trimer (TR) exhibited antioxidant activity more than 1 order of magnitude greater than that of a-tocopherol or ascorbic acid on a molar basis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available