4.0 Article

Relative impact of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism - A population-based study

Journal

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 162, Issue 11, Pages 1245-1248

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.162.11.1245

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL66216, HL46974] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR30562] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess the potential impact of controlling risk factors on the incidence of venous thromboembolism by estimating the population attributable risk (defined as the percentage of all cases of a disease in a population that can be attributed to a risk factor) for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism associated with venous thromboembolism risk factors. Methods: Using data from a population-based, nested, case-control study of the 625 Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents with a definite first lifetime deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism diagnosed during the 15-year period 1976 to 1990 and 625 unaffected Olmsted County residents matched for age and sex, we developed a conditional logistic regression model appropriate to the matched case-control study design and then estimated attributable risk for the risk factors individually and collectively. Results: Fifty-nine percent of the cases of venous thromboembolism in the community could be attributed to in stitutionalization (current or recent hospitalization or nursing home residence). Hospitalization for surgery (24%) and for medical illness (22%) accounted for a similar proportion of the cases, while nursing home residence accounted for 13%. The individual attributable risk estimates for malignant neoplasm, trauma, congestive heart failure, central venous catheter or pacemaker placement, neurological disease with extremity paresis, and superficial vein thrombosis were 18%, 12%, 10%, 9%, 7%, and 5%, respectively. Together, the 8 risk factors accounted for 74% of disease occurrence. Conclusions: Factors associated with institutionalization independently account for more than 50% of all cases of venous thromboembolism in the community. Greater emphasis should be placed on prophylaxis for hospitalized medical patients. Other recognized risk factors account for about 25% of all cases of venous thromboembolism, while the remaining 25% of cases are idiopathic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available