4.5 Review

Enzymatic acylation of di- and trisaccharides with fatty acids:: choosing the appropriate enzyme, support and solvent

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages 55-66

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1656(02)00037-8

Keywords

lipases; proteases; sucrose; transesterification; enzyme immobilisation; solvent mixtures; Thermomyces lanuginosus; Candida antarctica

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enzymatic synthesis of fatty acid esters of di- and trisaccharides is limited by the fact that most biological catalysts are inactivated by the polar solvents (e.g. dimethylsulfoxide, dimethylformamide) where these carbohydrates are soluble. This article reviews the methodologies developed to overcome this limitation, namely those involving control over the reaction medium, the enzyme and the support. We have proposed the use of mixtures of miscible solvents (e.g. dimethylsulfoxide and 2-methyl-2-butanol) as a general strategy to acylate enzymatically hydrophilic substrates. We observed that decreasing the hydrophobicity of the medium (i.e. lowering the percentage of DMSO) the molar ratio sucrose diesters versus sucrose monoesters can be substantially enhanced. The different regioselectivity exhibited by several lipases and proteases makes feasible to synthesise different positional isomers, whose properties may vary considerably. In particular, the lipase from Thermomyces lanuginosus displays a notable selectivity for only one hydroxyl group in the acylation of sucrose, maltose, leucrose and maltotriose, compared with lipase from Candida antarctica. We have examined three immobilisation methods (adsorption on polypropylene, covalent coupling to Eupergit C, and silica-granulation) for sucrose acylation catalysed by T. lanuginosus lipase. The morphology of the support affected significantly the reaction rate and/or the selectivity of the process. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available