4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

The network vs. pacemaker theory of the activity of RVL presympathetic neurons - a comparison with another putative pacemaker system

Journal

AUTONOMIC NEUROSCIENCE-BASIC & CLINICAL
Volume 98, Issue 1-2, Pages 85-89

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1566-0702(02)00038-3

Keywords

rostral ventrolateral medulla; presympathetic neurons; pacemaker activity; substantia nigra zona compacta; rat

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intracellular studies previously conducted in our laboratory on adult rats indicate that the activity of spinally projecting RVL neurons (neurons located in the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla) results from synaptic inputs. The data obtained by others in medullary slices suggest that the firing of these neurons (RVL C1 and/or non-C1 type, depending on experimental conditions) is mainly determined by their 'beating' pacemaker properties. Interestingly, there is an analogy between the contrasting views on the role of the network vs. pacemakers in the generation of sympathetic tone, and a debate regarding the relative role of such mechanisms in other types of 'spontaneously' active neurons, including dopaminergic neurons of the Substantia Nigra/Ventral Tegmental Area (in ventral mesencephalon). This short review discusses our previous in vivo studies and more recent data obtained in vitro after acute cell isolation, showing that under both experimental conditions, the RVL neurons display no clear pacemaker-like properties. Interestingly, pacemaker activity of dopaminergic mesencephalic neurons can be easily demonstrated in brain slices and after acute isolation, but not in vivo. These findings strongly suggest that under normal in vivo conditions, individual neurons belonging to these two neural systems function as elements of networks. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available