4.8 Article

Kinetics of cadmium uptake by chitosan-based crab shells

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 36, Issue 13, Pages 3219-3226

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00044-1

Keywords

chitosan; Cd removal; heavy metals; sorption; mass transfer; intraparticle diffusion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crushed crab shells were chemically treated to transform the chitin present into chitosan. Three particle sizes with average diameters of 0.65, 1.43 and 3.38 mm, average pore diameters ranging from approximate to 300 to 540 Angstrom, and a specific surface area of;:t 30 m(2)/g were obtained. Batch experiments were performed to study the uptake equilibrium and kinetics of cadmium by chitosan. Adsorption equilibrium followed a Freundlich relationship and was found to be independent of particle size indicating that adsorption takes place largely in the pore space. A high initial rate of cadmium uptake was followed by a slower uptake rate suggesting intraparticle diffusion as the rate-limiting step. The kinetic uptake data were successfully modeled using a pore diffusion model incorporating nonlinear adsorption. The effect of boundary layer resistance was modeled through inclusion of a mass transfer expression at the outside boundary, Two fitting parameters, the tortuosity factor (tau) and the mass transfer coefficient at the outside boundary (k(c)) were used. These parameters were unique for all solute and sorbent concentrations. The tortuosity factors varied from 1.5 for large particles to 5.1 for small particles. The mass transfer coefficient varied from 2 x 10(-7) m/s at 50 rpm to 2 x 10(-3) m/s at 200 rpm. At agitation rates below 100 rpm, boundary layer resistance reduced the uptake rate significantly. Its very high sorption capacity and relatively low production cost make chitosan an attractive sorbent for the removal of heavy metals from waste streams. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available