4.2 Article

NMR nomenclature: nuclear spin properties and conventions for chemical shifts. IUPAC Recommendations 2001

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN CHEMISTRY
Volume 40, Issue 7, Pages 489-505

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrc.1042

Keywords

NMR; nomenclature; nuclear spin properties; chemical shifts; IUPAC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A unified scale is recommended for reporting the NMR chemical shifts of all nuclei relative to the (1)H resonance of tetramethylsilane. The unified scale is designed to provide a precise ratio, Xi, of the resonance frequency of a given nuclide to that of the primary reference, the (1)H resonance of tetramethylsilane (TMS) in dilute solution (volume fraction, (p < 1%) in chloroform. Referencing procedures are discussed, including matters of practical application of the unified scale. Special attention is paid to recommended reference samples, and values of Xi for secondary references on the unified scale are listed, many of which are the results of new measurements. Some earlier recommendations relating to the reporting of chemical shifts are endorsed. The chemical shift, delta, is redefined to avoid previous ambiguities but to leave practical usage unchanged. Relations between the unified scale and recently published recommendations for referencing in aqueous solutions (for specific use in biochemical work) are discussed, as well as the special effects of working in the solid state with magic-angle spinning. In all, nine new recommendations relating to chemical shifts are made. Standardized nuclear spin data are also presented in tabular form for the stable (and some unstable) isotopes of all elements with non-zero quantum numbers. The information given includes quantum numbers, isotopic abundances, magnetic moments, magnetogyric ratios and receptivities, together with quadrupole moments and linewidth factors (where appropriate). Copyright (C) 2001 IUPAC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available