4.5 Article

Muscle-specific glucose and free fatty acid uptake after sprint interval and moderate-intensity training in healthy middle-aged men

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 118, Issue 9, Pages 1172-1180

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01122.2014

Keywords

HIT; exercise; metabolism; skeletal muscle; glucose uptake

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. University of Turku
  3. Abo Akademi University
  4. Academy of Finland [251399, 251572, 256470, 281440, 283319]
  5. Paavo Nurmi Foundation
  6. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  7. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  8. European Foundation
  9. Hospital District of Southwest Finland
  10. Orion Research Foundation
  11. Finnish Cardiovascular Foundation
  12. Finnish Diabetes Foundation
  13. Ministry of Education of the State of Finland
  14. Turku University Hospital
  15. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF13OC0004987] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. Academy of Finland (AKA) [251572] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We tested the hypothesis that sprint interval training (SIT) causes larger improvements in glucose and free fatty acid uptake (FFAU) in lower and upper body muscles than moderate-intensity training (MIT). Twenty-eight healthy, untrained, middle-aged men were randomized into SIT (n = 14, 4-6 x 30 s of all-out cycling/4 min recovery) and MIT groups [n = 14, 40-60 min cycling at 60% of peak O-2 uptake (VO2 peak)] and completed six training sessions within 2 wk. Pre-and post measurements included VO2 (peak), whole body (M-value), muscle-specific insulin- stimulated glucose uptake (GU), and fasting FFAU measured with positron emission tomography in thigh [quadriceps femoris (QF) and hamstrings] and upper body (deltoids, biceps, and triceps brachii) muscles. V-O2 (peak) and M-value improved significantly by 6 and 12% in SIT, and 3 and 8% in MIT, respectively,. GU increased significantly only in the QF, and there was no statistically significant difference between the training modes. GU increased in all four heads of QF in response to SIT, but only in the vasti muscles in response to MIT, whereas in rectus femoris the response was completely lacking. Training response in FFAU in QF was smaller and nonsignificant, but it also differed between the training modes in the rectus femoris. In conclusion, SIT and MIT increased insulin-stimulated GU only in the main working muscle QF and not in the upper body muscles. In addition, the biarticular rectus femoris did not respond to moderate intensity training, reflecting most probably poor activation of it during moderate-intensity cycling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available